Call Us for a Free Case Review

609.243.0300

201.820.0644

Zatuchni & Associates
  • About
    • Firm Overview
    • About David Zatuchni
    • Recent Employment Law Settlements And Verdicts
  • Practice Areas
    • Racial Discrimination & Harassment
    • Ethnic Discrimination & Harassment
    • Sex Discrimination
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Age Discrimination & Harassment
    • Associational Discrimination and Harassment
    • View All Practice Areas
  • Blog
  • Locations
    • Lambertville Office
    • Hackensack Office
    • Other Areas We Serve
  • Contact
    • Free Case Review
Pregnancy Discrimination

Light-Duty Work During Pregnancy: Is Your Employer’s Policy Discriminatory?

David Zatuchni

Last updated on March 7, 2023
FacebookTweetPinPrint

Pregnant employees – especially those categorized as “high-risk”– often ask their employers for a temporary reassignment to light-duty work prior to taking maternity leave.  Desk work, for example, may be medically necessary for a pregnant employee whose physician has placed restrictions on the amount she may lift, stand, or walk. 

See also: What Does Pregnancy Discrimination In the Workplace Look Like? 

Many if not most New Jersey employers have a policy in place for “light-duty” work.  But just because a policy exists does not mean that it’s legal. As a recent New Jersey appellate case shows, policies should treat pregnant employees requesting a light-duty accommodation the same as other, non-pregnant employees seeking the same accommodation.  Otherwise, such policies may well violate the new pregnancy protections of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (the “LAD”).

Delanoy v. Township of Ocean

In Delanoy v. Township of Ocean, Docket No. A-2899-17T4 (App. Div. January 3, 2020), the plaintiff was a police officer who informed her Police Department (PD) supervisors that she was pregnant, and that her doctor advised her to be taken off patrol through the duration of her pregnancy as a result.  The plaintiff asked the PD for the specific accommodation of being transferred to “light-duty” work during her pregnancy.

The PD did in fact assign the plaintiff to a light-duty job – an administrative position with the records division – pursuant to the PD’s “Maternity Assignment Standard Operating Procedure” policy, or “Maternity SOP”.  Under the Maternity SOP, the plaintiff was required to exhaust all of her accumulated paid leave time as a condition of receiving the light-duty job. In practice, this meant that the plaintiff had to deplete her paid leave by beginning maternity leave roughly two weeks earlier than she had planned, even though she was allegedly still able to report to her light-duty position during that time.  

The wrinkle in this case was that the PD had another, separate policy that governed requests for light-duty work from non-pregnant employees: The Light-Duty Standard Operating Procedure, or “Light-Duty SOP.” Just like the Maternity SOP, the Light-Duty SOP required employees to exhaust all accumulated paid leave time as a condition of receiving light-duty work.  However, unlike the Maternity SOP, the Light-Duty SOP allowed the Chief of Police to waive the exhaustion of leave requirement for employees at his discretion.

Long story short, the plaintiff filed a pregnancy discrimination claim against the PD.  Part of her claim sought a declaratory judgment (in other words, a legally binding declaration by a court) that the PD’s Maternity SOP was discriminatory under the LAD.  The lower court dismissed the plaintiff’s claim via a summary judgment decision. However, the appellate court reversed, holding that the Light-Duty SOP gave non-pregnant employees preferential treatment over pregnant employees seeking a similar light-duty accommodation. Specifically, the Light-Duty SOP gave non-pregnant employees the chance to have their exhaustion-of-leave condition waived by the Chief of Police, while pregnant employees were denied that option.

In reaching its conclusion, the appellate court relied upon new language added to the LAD via the New Jersey Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (the “PWFA”):

“It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to treat, for employment-related purposes, a woman employee that the employer knows or should know is affected by pregnancy . . . in a manner less favorable than the treatment of other persons not affected by pregnancy . . . but similar in their ability or inability to work.”

What to Watch Out For

Given Delanoy, pregnant employees seeking a light-duty workplace accommodation should ask:

Does my employer have a single policy for requesting light-duty work that applies to all workers?  Or is there a separate policy that applies only to pregnant workers?

  • If your employer has two policies: Are they written, on their face, to give equal treatment to pregnant and non-pregnant workers in seeking a light-duty accommodation?  Or do they impose more onerous requirements upon one group?
  • If your employer has a single policy: In practice, is it applied equally to pregnant and non-pregnant workers alike? Or does one group find that their requests for light-duty work are usually granted while the other finds their requests denied or limited?
  • Are all workers who request an accommodation for light-duty work free from harassment and/or retaliation?  These can take the form of negative reviews, reduced hours or shift changes, or hassling over medical documentation.

The upshot is, pregnant and non-pregnant employees should be treated alike when they ask for light-duty work.  If you are pregnant and concerned that your employer has a discriminatory light-duty policy, or is applying it unevenly, call our offices today for a free consultation.

Home / Pregnancy Discrimination / Light-Duty Work During Pregnancy: Is Your Employer’s Policy Discriminatory?
FacebookTweetPinPrint
David Zatuchni
David Zatuchni graduated from Northwestern University School of Law in 1995. Since that time, he has exclusively practiced in the field of employment law. For many years, Mr. Zatuchni defended large corporations in all types of employment discrimination lawsuits and labor law matters. Read More

Free Case Study

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Other Articles You May Like

lawyers near me for discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination

How Do You Prove Pregnancy Discrimination?

Discrimination Lawyer in New-Jersey
Pregnancy Discrimination

How Can I Sue for Pregnancy Discrimination?

Pregnancy Discrimination Morristown NJ Attorney
Pregnancy Discrimination

What Does Pregnancy Discrimination in the Workplace Look Like?

0 Comments

Join the conversation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

About
  • Firm Overview
  • About David Zatuchni
  • Recent Employment Law Settlements and Verdicts
  • Contact

Super Lawyer rating

Member of the National Employment Lawyers Association

Zatuchni & Associates LLC BBB accredited business profile
BBB RATING: A+
Practice Areas
  • Racial Discrimination & Harassment
  • Ethnic Discrimination & Harassment
  • Sex Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment Claims
  • Age Discrimination & Harassment
Lambertville Office

287 South Main Street, (Route 29)
Lambertville, NJ 08530
Phone: 609-243-0300

Hackensack Office

2 University Plaza, Suite 100
Hackensack, NJ 07601
Phone: (201) 820-0644

Copyright © 2023 Zatuchni Law. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Site Map